Seen at Last:
The Brain at Work
Canadian Reader’s Digest, January 1984
Feature, 2100 words
On March 5, 1979, a Medical Center technician at
the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) injected a sugarlike,
radioactive liquid into an intravenous line in the arm of Charles
Blackburn (not his real name), a healthy, 24-year-old computer programmer.
Blackburn was a volunteer in an extraordinary experiment. For the
next two hours, a fabulous new machine called a positron emission
tomography (PET) scanner would take a picture of what was going on
inside his brain.
Blackburn lay on a stainless-steel table with his
head in the scanner. It looked like an enormous metal box—more akin
to a clothes dryer than a marvel that can actually see a human brain
function. Blackburn was not worried about the radioactive sugar traveling
to his brain, where detectors in PET's camera could "see"
it and report its location to a computer. After all, he reminded himself,
the radiation he would receive would be minimal.
His ears plugged to keep him from being distracted,
Blackburn concentrated on a plain white light displayed on the wall.
Soon 12 cross-section "slices" of his brain appeared, one
after the other, on the computer's video screen, like slices of a
loaf of bread. They showed, amazingly, that when he looked at the
light, the primary visual cortex at the back of the brain shone like
a bulb on a Christmas tree.
When Blackburn's portraits were finished, the PET
scans appeared in glorious color. And biochemist Michael Phelps and
neurologist John Mazziotta, who designed the experiment, thanked him
for his part in a trail-blazing event.
The PET scanner fulfills a fantasy that neuroscientists
have had for years: seeing the brain at work, in three dimensions,
with minimal risk to the subject. Despite the astronomical cost of
the equipment—over $2 million for installation of a PET machine and
the cyclotron to make the radioactive chemicals it requires—and of
assembling an expert team of scientists and physicians to run it,
there now are 22 of these brain scanners in the world. Four Canadian
institutions have them: the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI);
McMaster University Health Centre, in Hamilton; Queen's University
Faculty of Medicine, in Kingston; and the University of British Columbia's
Imaging Research Centre, in Vancouver.
And
PET is well worth the expense. "It's one of the most important
developments ever to happen in brain sciences," says Dr. Herbert
Pardes, director of the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health in
Rockville, Md. Dr. William Feindel, director of the MNI, calls PET
"an enormous window into the chemistry of the living brain."
The
brain is really the last great medical frontier. Our information about
this extraordinarily complex organ is incomplete because so much of
what we want to know can be seen only in living people, and our ways
of exploring that terrain have been limited.
Until recently, technology has allowed scientists
to see only the brain's structure. Now, PET shows activities that
take place within the structure, like seeing and hearing, thinking
and feeling, moving and remembering. Think of the brain as a car engine,
suggests Dr. Antoine Hakim of the MNI. By looking at it, "we
can open the hood of the car and see belts and valves and other machinery.
But that doesn't give us any idea of what the engine does or how.
PET scanning allows us to put a tracer on the gasoline and air and
see where this mixture goes—how it creates motion."
The
brain's primary fuel is sugar or glucose, and in the late 1970s neurochemists
found a substance that mimics sugar, tagged it with a radioactive
isotope and devised a way of using it to measure the rate of utilization
of glucose by the brain. As the radioactive sugar travels around in
the bloodstream with the ordinary sugar, leaving a trail of its whereabouts
like the crumbs of Hansel and Gretel, it fools the brain into metabolizing
it just as if it were the real thing.
Because it isn't ordinary glucose, but rather its
radioactive cousin, FDG, it gets stuck. Its positron-emitting radiation,
meeting the normal inhabitants of living cells, electrons, sets off
a bizarre event: Positrons and electrons annihilate one another, creating
gamma rays. The PET scanner locates the gamma rays and sends this
information to the PET computer, which turns it into pictures. They
show which parts of the brain are working the hardest—those consuming
the most glucose—and which are idle—those using the least glucose.
The computer, programmed to indicate just how intense the activity
is, can provide pictures in different shades of gray, or in colors
ranging from white and red, which typically represent lots of activity,
to violet and blue, which represent little activity.
A musical mystery. On May 9, 1979, Sam Cohen
(not his real name), a 21-year-old student, reported to the UCLA Medical
Center to take part in a more complex PET experiment devised by Phelps
and Mazziotta. The research team had Cohen sit in a wheelchair. Immobilized,
his cars plugged to minimize input to other parts of his brain, he
was wheeled out to busy Westwood Boulevard. The researchers wanted
to see how his brain looked while he was watching a complex street-scene.
Would it look any different from a brain watching plain white light?
A
technician injected radioactive sugar into an intravenous line in
Cohen's right arm. For the next 40 minutes, Cohen gazed at the scenery
while the radioactive sugar wended its way to his brain. Then his
eyes were patched to preserve the image now in his brain and he was
rushed back to the medical center. The team took pictures before the
radioactivity in the sugar dissipated.
When they analyzed them, the researchers were delighted
to see in the back of the brain, the part that deals with vision,
a red area larger and more brilliant than the area they'd seen lighted
up in the brain watching white light. The more intense red corresponded
to the part of the brain thought to make complex visual interpretations.
PET had confirmed an accepted "fact": This part of the brain
works harder when it looks at more complicated scenes.
After
the vision experiments, UCLA researchers entered less charted territory.
Conventional wisdom has it that right-handed people use the left side
of the brain for language, and the right for artistic and emotional
matters. But in May 1980, when Christopher Englander (not his real
name), a right-handed, 24-year-old student, listened to sequences
of notes and tried to figure out whether or not they were alike, PET
revealed another of the brain's mysteries. Unlike other volunteers
who heard these same notes, Englander's brain turned brilliant red
on the left, or language, side, not on the right "artistic"
side. Had he listened differently, asked the puzzled scientists? Yes,
explained Englander, he had visualized the scale and put the notes
on it in his mind.
Next, the researchers tested a professional
musician. The left side of his brain, too, lit up like a neon sign.
The conclusion? Those who approach the problem analytically use
the left side of their brains, while those who sing the notes and
try to solve the problem intuitively use the right. The significance?
Says Mazziotta, "This demonstrates that two different brains
can address the same problem in a different way."
As chemists develop tags for other substances
in the body, PET will reveal more of the brain's wonders; and because
it shows disturbances as well as normal activity, PET is already
being used to investigate neurological diseases that still evade
medicine's grasp:
- Brain tumors can be treated with chemotherapy,
but until now no one has known whether the drugs were reaching
their target or how effective they were. In Montreal, Drs. William
Feindel, Lucas Yamamoto and Mirko Diksic have developed a method
of radioactively labeling BCNU, an anticancer drug that shrinks
brain tumors. The PET scanner shows that the drug gets into some
tumors—primarily those that are growing rapidly—and not others,
telling doctors which patients are likely to respond to chemotherapy.
By revealing the concentration of BCNU in the tumor, PET also
allows doctors to treat patients with the optimal dose, rather
than just bombarding them with the largest their bodies can tolerate.
- Epilepsy doesn't always respond to
medication, and for perhaps 30 to 50 percent of epileptics like
Adell Forbush, a pretty red-haired teenager in Brea, Calif., PET
brings new hope. When 17 pills a day could no longer control her
seizures, Adell and her family despaired. Surgery seemed a promising
solution, but conventional diagnostic techniques failed to show
which part of her brain was damaged. Then, during two weeks of
extensive tests in Dr. Jerome Engel Jr.'s epilepsy unit at UCLA
Medical Center, PET pinpointed the area of Adell's brain that
was not working properly. Because it used very little sugar, it
was blue in the PET pictures. With this evidence, surgeons operated.
Now 21 and seizure-free for four years, Adell Forbush is working
in a bank.
- Parkinson's disease, which causes
rigidity and tremor in many elderly persons, is associated with
a deficiency of dopamine, a chemical that allows brain cells to
communicate with one another. At McMaster, Dr. Stephen Garnett,
chemist Gunter Fimau and physicist Claude Nahmias have used the
PET scanner to "snap" dopamine in action in a living
person for the first time. Its natural pathways in normal brains—red
and pink on the scan—can be seen clearly when its radioactively
labeled chemical cousin, fluorodopa, enters the brain and turns
into dopamine. Doctors prescribe L-dopa to replace the dopamine
lacking in victims of Parkinson's, but its effects are unpredictable.
The McMaster team hopes its PET scans will show how the use of
drugs can be improved.
- Stroke, which kills brain tissue
by depriving it of blood and oxygen, is hard to treat effectively.
But PET brings a new approach for the 550,000 North Americans
felled by strokes each year. Using radioactive oxygen, radioactive
carbon dioxide and FDG, the PET scans can distinguish between
injured and dead tissue immediately after a stroke. Says Hakim,
"With PET we can see which part of the brain has died, and
which part is getting just enough blood to stay alive but not
enough to work effectively." Hakim and his colleagues are
also using PET to evaluate various medical and surgical therapies
to see which ones restore function to injured tissue. In St. Louis,
investigators are using PET to identify stroke patients who would
benefit from surgery to bypass a blocked brain artery. In 1981
Edward Criger, 70, of Bonnots Mill, Mo., suffered attacks. "My
whole body would go weak," says Criger. "I'd fall over
if I didn't have a chair handy." Tests at Washington University
Medical School showed a blocked artery in Criger's brain, but
a PET scan revealed something even more frightening: a deep blue
area just above the blockage where his brain was being starved
of life-sustaining blood and oxygen. Doctors did bypass surgery
to give his brain a new blood supply. Now his attacks have virtually
ceased.
- Mental illness is the most difficult
of all brain diseases to study because of the elusiveness of its
physical base. But the PET scanner provides a handle on the neurochemical
basis of behavior for the first time, raising hopes that such
complex disorders as schizophrenia will finally be understood
and therefore more easily treated.
By
making earlier diagnosis possible through its ability to show changes
in the functions of organs, PET is creating a new era in medicine.
"If we can detect the first disorders before there are structural
changes," says Dr. David E. Kuhl of UCLA, "we may be able
to do something about it, rather than depending on diagnostic methods
that show only the graveyard of the organ after the damage has been
done. This is frontier research where we have learned a lot in a relatively
short time." Adds Phelps: "It's an era in which we'll be
able to enter the human body safely, wander around with our little
chemistry kit, and measure what's going on."
Click here to return to
a list of Judy’s work.
This
material is copyrighted and may not be reproduced in any manner or
medium without written permission. For information, contact judy@challengingbehavior.com.
|